Resources, support and tutoring just for chemistry.

let’s get chem done.

We’re not here to try to convince you that chemistry is the greatest subject. (That’s already known to be true.)

The goal is to get chemistry done.

Unfortunately the way to do it is to learn. But that doesn’t mean tears and frustration. And that doesn’t always mean cotton candy and rainbows. We are here to support you whether you are in love with science (weird) or just looking to pass your class.

A collection of 15 images of pennies, each with a different mix of letters, numbers, and images engraved on them.

The most helpful resource for chemistry on the internet

"Help" comes in many flavors, but finding the one that doesn't taste like "more work" is surprisingly tricky. We’ve mapped out our resources against your specific learning style so you don't have to.

Take the quiz to find your fit. The worst-case scenario? You spend two minutes learning about yourself. The best case? You walk away with the perfect toolβ€”and maybe a freebie upgrade.

Interactive Quiz

Help That Matches Your Learning Style

Take this quick quiz to find the best CHEMDUNN resources to help you!

Content Videos & Tutorials

Explore a massive library of video tutorials β€” whether if you're completely lost or just missing a little piece, find exactly what you need.

Fully Explained Problems

Finding the answer to a problem is a win but getting the step-by-step explanation is a party. Always the full explanation - never skip a step.

Quick and Easy to Navigate

Some sites just have way too much information. You came for help, not to read a book.

Matches your curriculum

Our material is organized by and covers what you will normally find in your course so you don’t need to search elsewhere (or at least we try!)

Human Help

AI is cool but sometimes you need to help of a human. Although our material might be enough CHEMDUNN also offers opportunity to connect with a human.

Dive deeper into a lab/ experiment

Everyone loves doing the labs but not the work after. Applying data to theoretical concepts is sometimes the worse … is mass suppose to be negative!?